The Dynamics of Argumentative Discourse

نویسندگان

چکیده

Arguments have always played a central role within logic and philosophy. But little attention has been paid to arguments as distinctive kind of discourse, with its own semantics pragmatics. The goal this essay is study the mechanisms by means which we make in starting from argument connectives such ‘therefore’. While some proposals made literature, they fail account for anaphoric behavior ‘therefore’, well uses complex arguments, suppositional non-declarative conclusions, parenthetical remarks. We argue that comprehensive requires imposing tree-like structure on contexts. show how extend our accommodate modal subordination different flavors connectives.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

on the relationship between using discourse markers and the quality of expository and argumentative academic writing of iranian english majors

the aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and the type of discourse markers used in the argumentative and expository writings of iranian efl learners and the differences between these text features in the two essay genres. the study also aimed at examining the influence of the use of discourse markers on the participants’ writing quality. to this end the discourse markers us...

15 صفحه اول

Analyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse

Consider a discourse situation where the speaker tries to convince the hearer of a particular point of view. The first task for the hearer is to understand what it is the speaker wants him to believe-to analyze the structure of the argument being presented, before judging credibility and eventually responding. This paper describes a model for the analysis of arguments that includes: • a theory ...

متن کامل

Analyzing Argumentative Discourse Units in Online Interactions

Argument mining of online interactions is in its infancy. One reason is the lack of annotated corpora in this genre. To make progress, we need to develop a principled and scalable way of determining which portions of texts are argumentative and what is the nature of argumentation. We propose a two-tiered approach to achieve this goal and report on several initial studies to assess its potential.

متن کامل

Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays

In this paper, we present a novel approach for identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. The structure of argumentation consists of several components (i.e. claims and premises) that are connected with argumentative relations. We consider this task in two consecutive steps. First, we identify the components of arguments using multiclass classification. Second, we clas...

متن کامل

heterogeneity within the orientalist discourse: representation of the orient in womens travelogues and mens paintings

from 1950s onward, new theories and critical approaches burgeoned across humanities. these theories were context-oriented; as a result, the analysis of discursive practices gained significance. thus, social, political, historical and cultural discourses that have been hitherto marginalized and considered inferior to literary texts, were introduced as important texts to be analyzed by critics. o...

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Philosophical Logic

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1573-0433', '0022-3611']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09636-2